Current:Home > reviewsSupreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S. -TrueNorth Capital Hub
Supreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S.
View
Date:2025-04-17 17:19:12
The Supreme Court put on hold the linchpin of President Obama’s climate policy, barring the Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday from carrying out the administration’s new Clean Power Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from electric power plants.
It was a surprising decision of staggering proportions, with repercussions that go far beyond the U.S. electrical grid, threatening the credibility of the Paris Agreement on climate change reached by the world’s nations in December.
The Clean Power Plan, designed to reduce by nearly a third emissions from fossil fuel-burning electricity plants, is the central element of the pledge by the United States to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 percent by 2025.
It was an unusual intervention by the Supreme Court, given that a powerful appeals court had just weeks ago turned down a request by dozens of states and their allies in the fossil fuel industries to impose a stay on the new federal regulation.
By blocking enforcement of the rule, the justices sent a signal that conservatives on the court may be inclined to limit the agency’s powers under the Clean Air Act. The Supreme Court found in its 2007 decision Massachusetts v. EPA that the statute allows controls on carbon dioxide emissions that cause global warming.
It would have taken years for the Clean Power Plan to take full effect, but the first step would have been for states to file implementation plans starting in September. Planning was well under way for that. About half the states had joined in appealing the rule, and some of them had declared that they would have refused to file state plans. Now, none of them will have to meet the rule’s deadlines, which the EPA will be powerless to enforce.
SCOTUSblog, an authoritative web site covering the Supreme Court, said that the order “will delay all parts of the plan, including all deadlines that would stretch on into 2030, until after the D.C. Circuit completes its review and the Supreme Court has finished, if the case does wind up there. There appears to be little chance for those two stages of review to be over by the time President Obama’s term ends next January 20.”
Josh Earnest, the White House spokesman, said “we remain confident that we will prevail on the merits.” He said the EPA would continue working with those states that want to move ahead with pollution controls under the rule.
“I am extremely disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision,” said Attorney General Kamala Harris of California, one of 17 states that argued in favor of the rule in the appeals court. “The Court’s decision, and the special interests working to undermine this plan, threatens our environment, public health and economy.”
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey, whose state is the lead plaintiff challenging the rule, said “we are thrilled” by the “great victory.”
But environmental advocacy groups said they were confident that the rule would eventually pass judicial muster, and that in the meantime the trend toward greener power would continue.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has scheduled arguments for June and is expected to rule by late summer or early fall. An appeal to the Supreme Court would most likely be decided next year, after President Obama is out of office.
“We are confident the courts will ultimately uphold the Clean Power Plan on its merits,” said David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The electricity sector has embarked on an unstoppable shift from its high-pollution, dirty-fueled past to a safer, cleaner-powered future, and the stay cannot reverse that trend.”
veryGood! (841)
Related
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Supreme Court extends freeze on changes to abortion pill access until Friday
- New Tar Sands Oil Pipeline Isn’t Worth the Risks, Minnesota Officials Say
- Here's What Kate Middleton Said When Asked to Break Royal Rule About Autographs
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Walmart will dim store light weekly for those with sensory disabilities
- A first-generation iPhone sold for $190K at an auction this week. Here's why.
- New Tar Sands Oil Pipeline Isn’t Worth the Risks, Minnesota Officials Say
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Bama Rush Deep-Dives Into Sorority Culture: Here's Everything We Learned
Ranking
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- We asked, you answered: What's your secret to staying optimistic in gloomy times?
- Trump wants the death penalty for drug dealers. Here's why that probably won't happen
- Feds penalize auto shop owner who dumped 91,000 greasy pennies in ex-worker's driveway
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- The Kids Are Not Alright
- The History of Ancient Hurricanes Is Written in Sand and Mud
- He helped craft the 'bounty hunter' abortion law in Texas. He's just getting started
Recommendation
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
America has a loneliness epidemic. Here are 6 steps to address it
American Idol Singer Iam Tongi Reacts to Crazy Season 21 Win
The truth about teens, social media and the mental health crisis
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
Tracking health threats, one sewage sample at a time
U.S. Military Bases Face Increasingly Dangerous Heat as Climate Changes, Report Warns
The Truth About Tom Sandoval and Influencer Karlee Hale's Relationship